Comments on: SkyQuotaX 2.0 Released - with Telenet support ! http://www.natal.be/index.php/2005/08/skyquota-20-released-with-telenet-support/ Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:18:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: N Vande Casteele http://www.natal.be/index.php/2005/08/skyquota-20-released-with-telenet-support/#comment-4 N Vande Casteele Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:22:29 +0000 http://www.natal.be/index.php/?p=7#comment-4 Yes, I agree, memory usage is not optimal. The main reason for that is because it is written in Java. Similar programs also written in Java take up equal amounts of memory. I'm looking into porting it to the native Objective-C language in the future which should drastically cut back memory usage. Yes, I agree, memory usage is not optimal. The main reason for that is because it is written in Java. Similar programs also written in Java take up equal amounts of memory. I’m looking into porting it to the native Objective-C language in the future which should drastically cut back memory usage.

]]> By: BlankStar http://www.natal.be/index.php/2005/08/skyquota-20-released-with-telenet-support/#comment-3 BlankStar Tue, 02 Aug 2005 06:34:32 +0000 http://www.natal.be/index.php/?p=7#comment-3 It's a nice program and it's good and stable. But when checking it's RAM-usage I saw a shocking 40,03MB (program was in use for one hour). In comparison: Quicktime with the welcomescreen open (iTunes commercial and stuff) uses 20,96MB. So I have to conclude that the program needs some fine-tuning. Cheers, BlankStar PS Keep up the good work, it's a nice program and the growl support is neat. It’s a nice program and it’s good and stable. But when checking it’s RAM-usage I saw a shocking 40,03MB (program was in use for one hour). In comparison: Quicktime with the welcomescreen open (iTunes commercial and stuff) uses 20,96MB. So I have to conclude that the program needs some fine-tuning.

Cheers,

BlankStar

PS Keep up the good work, it’s a nice program and the growl support is neat.

]]>